Upaya Meningkatkan Belajar PKN Melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif Model STAD (Student Teams Achievement Division) pada Siswa Kelas XII IPS Tahun Pelajaran 2022/2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30653/003.202392.74Kata Kunci:
Learning outcomes, STAD model.Abstrak
This research was motivated by observation data which showed that student learning outcomes in PPKN material were very low. To respond to this, researchers conducted classroom action research aimed at improving student learning outcomes. The objectives to be achieved in this research include: (1) Knowing the implementation of the Cooperative Learning Model method CITY (Student Teams Achievement Division) in improving student learning outcomes, (2) Knowing the improvement in student learning outcomes with the Model CITY (Student Teams Achievement Division). This research is classroom action research using the cooperative STAD model. This research was conducted in class XII with a total of 40 students. This research measures all domains of learning outcomes, namely: cognitive, affective and psychomotor. The research results show an increase in each domain in each cycle. By using the STAD cooperative model, students gain direct learning experience so that learning is more interesting and can improve student learning outcomes. From the data, it is recommended that teachers use the STAD cooperative model in PPKN learning at SMAN 14 Pandeglang to improve student learning outcomes
Referensi
Ali, Muhammad. 1996. Guru Dalam Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindon .
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1993. Manajemen Mengajar Secaraa Manusiawi. Jakarata: Rineksa Cipta
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2001.Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineksa Cipta.
Azhar, Lalu Muhammad. 1993. Proses Belajar Mengajar Pendidikan. Jakarta: Usaha Nasional.
Daroeso, Bambang. 1989. Dasar dan Konsep Pendidikan Moral Pancasila. Semarang: Aneka Ilmu.
Djamarah,Syaiful Bahri. 2002. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineksa Putra.
Djamarah,Syaiful Bahri. 2002. psikologi belajar. Rineksa Putra.
Felder, Richad M. 1994. Cooperative Learning In The Technical Corse, (online), (PclldMy% DocumentCoop % 20 Report.
Hadi, Sutrisno. 1982. metodologi research, jilid I.yogayakarta: yp. Fak. Psikologi UGM.
Hamalik, Oemar. 2002. Psikologi Belajar dan Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo
Hasibuan, JJ. dan Moerdjiono. 1998. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Margono. 1997. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineksa Cipta.
Masriyah. 1999. Analisis Butir Tes. Surabaya: Universiats Press.
Ngalim, Purwanto M. 1990. Psikologi Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nur,Moh. 2001. Pemotivasian Siswa Untuk Belajar. Surabaya. University Press.
Universitas Negeri Srabaya.
Nur, Muhammad. 1996. Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Surabaya University Negeri.
Riduwan. 2005. Belajar Mudah Penelitian Untuk Guru–Karyawan dan Peneliti Pemula. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Rustiyah, N.K.1991. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta Bina Aksara.
Sardiman, A.M. 1996. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Soekamto. Toeti. 1997. Teori Belajar dan Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PAU-PPAI, Universitas Terbuka.
Soetomo, 1993. Dasar-Dasar Interaksi Belajar Mengajar. Surabaya Usaha Nasional.
Sudjana, N dan Ibrahim. 1989. Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung: Sinar Baru.
Sudjana. 1996. Metode Statistik. Bandung: Tarsito.
Sukidin dkk. 2002. Manajemen Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Surabaya: Insane Cendekia.
Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. 2005. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Surakhamad, Winarno. 1990. Metode Pengajaran Nasional. Bandung: Jemmars.
Suryosubroto, B. 1997. Proses Belajar Mengajar di Sekolah. Jakarta: PT. Rineksa Cipta.
Syah, Muhibbin. 1995. Psikologi Pendidikan, Suatu Pendekatan Baru, Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Usman, Moh. Uzer. 2001. Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.